Mainokset
Your Ad Here
Jos et halua mainoksia sivuille Liity jäseneksi!

Re: WDC Amateur League OPEN World Amateur Championships CORRECT POST VERSION

   
Joined on 12 helmi 2007
Total posts: 74

Re: No 1 WDC Amateur League OPEN World Amateur Championships CORRECT POST VERSION

12. toukokuuta 2008 8:17

@Keggs. 
 You asked why the WDC could not call off their event as a gesture of goodwill.
I know and you should know that it would not be accepted as such.  It would be "spun" into retreat, it would  be defined as a defeat for the WDC. A lack of support amongst competitors and adjudicators.  It would be claimed that WDC had failed all those who signed the danceinternationaaL declaration and registered for the Amateur League.  It would be claimed WDC were turning their back on those Amateurs who had been ex-communicated by IDSF.
A real gesture of goodwill would be for the IDSF to agree to dancers competing in an Open Market atmosphere and for an Amnesty for those who had "upset" the IDSF previously. 
Many people are only too well aware of the competitions  the long established and the new which the IDSF destroyed or attempted to destroy.
 
 
Can I add here I most certainly do not want you to make any derogatory statement at all.  You are able to make your own decisions, express them. stand by them.
 
EDITED ADDITION:
Keggs I have just read Martyns story.   There are important  differences. We do not know if  all the best Karate competitors were Professionals and already members of one of two bodies and joined there by all the best past champions and todays trainers and developers od the sport.  May we ask the name of these 2 organisations? 
I know the World Karate Federation is an IOC member.  Did the IOC take no action to prevent the situation?
I would also ask does Martyn partake in another sport? Does Martyn hold a certain position with an interested body?  Is Martyn impartial or trying to present his "story" in the best light for his "side"?  Thats the strong impression I am left with. He makes many claims which need not be relevant to dancing at all and he is guessing (or pretending),.
Personally I would need very much more factual detail  and conformation/proof  of the claims made before swallowing them.  Where did you first read Martyns story? It is altready public information and an atempt to  discredit the WDC-..
Why not wake Martyn up and tell him those countries driving the IDSF today are not the least interested in England and if they can do harm then they will and take pleasure from it-.
Yet another reason why I find your position strange when you want a better future for England/Britain.
 
From Martyns words

"even now I hesitate in writing this for fear of damaging my future career in the sport."

It seems he is afraid of the intimidation and threats.  To which dance organisations does he belong that instill this fear in him?.

 I wish you had given us all the information at the outset rather than by my doing "searches".   and finding out.  Sorry if this makes me a bad person in your books.
 
The only  connection between Martyns story and the WDC Open Amateur World Championships seems for me to be the fear being instilled in the competitors with reprisals if they dance..
 
Perhaps Martyn should read the words of Mr. Bain it might give him some new insight into what is happening..
 
@Think of Me. 
 I think if there is confusion it is with you.  Instead of finding the conversation "entertaining" it would be better to seek your own answers.  Iif you have not already decided where your  loyalties will go then sooner or later you will.  Think about it.
 
@aspirin. 
 If by dancers you mean amateur competitors then is it not a bad reflection on IDSF and the policies that they have created a fragmented world?  Have they done this deliberately so the dancers feel they cannot achieve their own wishes?
 
@ Elaine- 
From some of my earlier words you will know I share your sentiments.  I am not sure that a world wide movement is necessary. In each country the dancers meet at comps etc and they can surely reach a majority agreement and take this up with their Organisation leaders and if that fails take action.  The Danish Latin Couples did this and it went on to assist the standard dancers also.
For NOT competing dancers have been threatened before.  Some times it has been individual couples threatened by important figures. Sometimes it has been national associations requiring their couples to compete at a certain event.  As with the World Games it has been National Members threatened if they did not send a representative - if they had possible semi finalists.
 
@sunshine2.
I do not know if you meant it but I found your words rather mocking and scornful of Elaine's view.
However you are presupposing that the wheelchair and others wished to remain part of IDSF when the huge part of their membership had been suspended/banned/defected.  They might feel rather isolated and out in the cold.  You also overlook the huge loss of income for the IDSF.  No more cash coming in for all those IDSF Opens, Grand Slams and dozens of "Championships"
Adjudicators might return licences when there are so very few competitions to adjudicate. 
Sometimes one wonders do the IDSF only involve the wheelchair and other dancers because it increases their power. Certainly they are given few opportunities to display their wonderful art..
 
General Comment
I am sure that the IDSF pray every night that the thinking of some members of the forum will continue.
It suits then for Dancers to think and proclaim they are powerless and therefore it is useless to take any action. Inj fact this is paramount for IDSF.
It suits them for Dancers to believe they are Prisoners of War.
It suits them for Dancers to believe that the IDSF have great ideas and are doing something.
It suits them that Dancers simply take the bait and believe something is happening because IDSF talk a good talk. without any following action.
 
 
With apologies to all I am going to also place this in the WDC vs IDSF thread which is where it belongs in general.  I also want to add a few further thoughts. 
 
   
 
Joined on 12 helmi 2007
Total posts: 74

Re: No 1 WDC Amateur League OPEN World Amateur Championships CORRECT POST VERSION

19. kesäkuuta 2008 7:46

Interesting that the announcement on the IDSF web site has been withdrawn.  Does that mean they have had a change of heart?  Are couples whose National Associations are members of  IDSF now free to compete?.  Are IDSF Licensed vAdjudicators now free to adjudicate ?  

If so why not announce that.

Or are they now trying to keep their draconion mentality under wraps?

Joined on 20 kesä 2008
Total posts: 11

Re: No 1 WDC Amateur League OPEN World Amateur Championships CORRECT POST VERSION

20. kesäkuuta 2008 1:12

Beg your pardon, what IDSF announcement was withdrawn ?

Are you asking if we can compete / adjudicate wherever or are you concluding, guessing, causing  confusion ?  This could be an important change  and accuracy of information isneeded. Pardon  for being so  serious but this could be important.

Draconian or not, you do not know reasons and intent,  so  why would you try   interpret, this  can only start trouble. Please take not personaly, we all want harmony an coopertaion, there ism just too much hot blood everywhere.

Joined on 12 helmi 2007
Total posts: 74

Re: No 1 WDC Amateur League OPEN World Amateur Championships CORRECT POST VERSION

20. kesäkuuta 2008 7:57

@Will2

This is the announcement that has been withdrawn. By "withdrawn" I mean it no longer appears on the Home Page of the IDSF website as was previously the case.

  Unregistered events
On December 5-7, 2008 there will be held in Paris a WDC event called "Open World Amateur Ballroom & Latin Championships 2008".

This event is an unregistered event by the IDSF and IDSF athletes, officials and Adjudicators are not allowed to participate in this competition.

 

Yes I am asking if all dancers can compete and if all Adjudicators can adjudicate.  Yes I absolutely agree that it is very very important for clarification. and accuracy of information. This is exactly why I ask the question.  It seems there is no desire by IDSF to clarify as there is no response to letters sent to the office of the President asking exactly what is the situation.

That the announcement has been withdrawn by IDSF without a contrary statement is certainly , I agree with you, only causing further doubts and confusion. 

Surely IDSF should announce "Stay away and our warning still applies" or "YES go ahead we have had a change of heart"   If indeed there has been a change of heart  that would be tremendous for everyone and can only be for the good. IDSF should be proud they had the wisdom to allow competitors from National Federations who are IDSF members to compete where they choose and adjudicators to judge where they choose.

 

I am not attempting to interpret as you suggest I am seeking clarification.    So forgive me if I do start to think that there is an unwillingness to give clarification. Much to my sincere regret we are surrounded by very troubled times and this has not been caused by me.  .

Joined on 13 tammi 2005
Total posts: 467

Re: No 1 WDC Amateur League OPEN World Amateur Championships CORRECT POST VERSION

20. kesäkuuta 2008 9:07

OK here it goes but please note that this is only RUMOURS and MY VIEW nothing official.

According to RUMOURS I have heard the IDSF is (about to?) change its stance towards non registered competitions and it will no longer excercise bans. The fact that the announcement you have seen have been withdrawn from their website SEEMS to support that the rumours are true. But again please note that this is not coming from official channels so all I am saying is watch the official announcements - since IDSF is a public organization there should be either a confirmation of this or a sign that it is not true.

MY VIEW is that if indeed the IDSF no longer bans competitions, that may not mean that they need to actively endorse them - i.e. I do not neccessarily think they need to list all competitions where IDSF is not involved... On the other hand I agree that clarifying that a previous ban was withdrawn would clear the situation up.

Anyways IF this is all true then I hope things will slowly get back to normal and organizations and people will start to focus on positive ideas and the development of the sport/art (depending on whose view you are asking).

 

Joined on 12 helmi 2007
Total posts: 74

Re: No 1 WDC Amateur League OPEN World Amateur Championships CORRECT POST VERSION

20. kesäkuuta 2008 11:38

@Peter

It seems we may have heard similar RUMOURS and that is why the clarification is so important.

 Part of the RUMOUR I have heard is that the official IDSF position will change but CERTAIN more EXTREME National Federations will continue to "ban" competors registered with other organisations from events they sanction and ban competitors registered with them from competing in their own countries and abroad in certain events.   Let us hope that is not true because we need co-operation between all the main bodies and quickly.

Does it really matter whether we call it sport or art so long as we all work together? To use this as the excuse to cause turmoil and division is in my view lunacy..

 

 

Joined on 09 joulu 2006
Total posts: 31

Re: No 1 WDC Amateur League OPEN World Amateur Championships CORRECT POST VERSION

21. kesäkuuta 2008 14:59

Please evryone stop wasting time and check the IDSF website, the relevant statement has now been tucked away on a page inside. It's still there but they no longer have the guts to keep it out in the open.

Joined on 12 helmi 2007
Total posts: 74

Re: No 1 WDC Amateur League OPEN World Amateur Championships CORRECT POST VERSION

21. kesäkuuta 2008 16:41

@moderateman

I do not doubt you but please can you let us know which inside page.

As soon as I noticed the reoval from the home page I did a "search" on the IDSF website and entered

Unregistered events

World Open Amateur Ballroom & Latin Championship

Paris

December

but nothing at all came up.

 

Joined on 09 joulu 2006
Total posts: 31

Re: No 1 WDC Amateur League OPEN World Amateur Championships CORRECT POST VERSION

21. kesäkuuta 2008 22:44

http://www.idsf.net/index.tpl?style=news&action=newsItem&id=20&jaar=2008

Joined on 12 helmi 2007
Total posts: 74

Re: No 1 WDC Amateur League OPEN World Amateur Championships CORRECT POST VERSION

22. kesäkuuta 2008 6:24

@moderate man.  Thank you for that and also your dilligence it findiong it!!

When one goes to the web site and searches for "unregistered events" and NOTHING comes up that is extremely bad.  What a way to cause confusion and doubt.  If they have not had a change of heart then they must feel ashamed to hide away something of that importance.  As will2 wrote it is "serious and very important" and concealment is shameful.. 

P.S. I have just checked the IDSF website again.  In the search I entered "news" no result. I entered "unregistered events" np result.  I entered "index" "no result   I searched through all the top headings with their sub sections and result nothing.  How do IDSF expect dancers to discover it when they hide it so very carefully.? 

Part of the RUMOUR i heard was that following Court action in certain countries where the local Amateur Body affiliated to IDSF were no longer permitted to ban THEIR members who are NOT IDSF members IDSF realised they did not have the power and authority to define people as "IDSF athletes",  It is a great shame that couples in all countries do not have the finance to take on the expenses of a Court battle to prove the point.  .

.